Now that electronic logging device (ELD) mandates are reality it’s the device’s and the law’s duty to ensure drivers comply with other rules that monitor and to a certain extent, control their behavior to proscribed norms.
Although the “big brother” aspect of ELDs are indisputable and driver’s privacy concerns are well founded, the technology may actually be helping rather than hindering driver’s time behind the wheel.
Where’s my pencil? I need to write this down
Electronically enabled monitoring and data logging generally relieves drivers of tedious logging and record-keeping (the paperwork) and automating many of those administrative and wrote logging tasks that most drivers on the road right now are now old enough to remember they learned to hate.
The technology facilitates considerably more accurate recording of all driver activity by providing periodic snapshots of the vehicle’s location throughout the driver’s day (mandated by HoS). ELDs automate the recording of a variety of metrics including:
Hours of service
Engine hours, operating time, fuel consumption, motion
Events vehicle integrity and security
Like molasses HoS mandates fluid, but sticking
One of the more heavily attended sessions during a recent ELD technology and service provider’s user conference was an update and Q&A session on upcoming electronic logging device mandate featuring Joe DeLorenzo, chief enforcement officer, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. According to Heavy Duty Trucking’s truckinfo.com, DeLorenzo’s headline was clear: “ELD Violations Are Down, but Drivers Still Making Simple Mistakes.”
Trimble describes its core technologies as being positioning, modeling, connectivity and data analytics. The company’s annual in.sight conference is an annual event held to help its services and technology users network and discover more effective ways to apply Trimble technologies to their operations.
DeLorenzo reviewed some of the FMCSA’s findings of ELD use to date: “Without a doubt, hours-of-service compliance improves with ELD use,” he said, noting the percentage of driver inspections with at least one HOS violation fell from “1.3% in December 2017 to 0.69% in April 2018 -- down to 0.57% in June 2019.”
According to DeLorenzo the system is beginning to work; He said FMCSA is seeing 35,000 successful transfers of ELD data monthly – an 80% success rate.
With these changes FMCSA hopes rules will stick
On September 19, the FMCSA opened a month-long public comment period for the industry and public to comment on five key modifications to the existing HOS rules; the agency proposes:
Changing the short-haul exception available to certain commercial drivers by lengthening the drivers’ maximum on duty period from 12 to 14 hours and extending the distance limit within which the driver may operate from 100 air miles to 150 air miles.
Modifying the adverse driving conditions exception by extending by 2 hours the maximum window during which driving is permitted.
Increasing the flexibility for the 30-minute break rule by tying the break requirement to 8 hours of driving time without an interruption for at least 30 minutes and allowing the break to be satisfied by a driver using on duty, not driving status, rather than off duty.
Modifying the sleeper-berth exception to allow drivers to split their required 10-hours off duty into two periods: an 8 and 2 split or a 7 and 3 split, either off duty or in the sleeper berth. Neither period would count against the driver’s 14 hour driving window.
Allowing one off-duty break of at least 30 minutes, but not more than 3 hours, that would pause a truck driver’s 14-hour driving window, provided the driver takes 10 consecutive hours off-duty at the end of the work shift.
FMCSA’s says its proposal is crafted to improve safety on the Nation’s roadways. The proposed rule would not increase driving time and would continue to prevent CMV operators from driving for more than eight consecutive hours without at least a 30-minute change in duty status.
FMCSA’s also notes its proposed rules covering hours of service are estimated to provide $274 million in savings for the U.S. economy and American consumers.
Automating safer behavior not drivers
With the help of ELDS and its cousin Internet of Things (IoT) sensing technology and it buddy the internet cloud, federal HoS regulation is, to a certain extent automating (as in controlling through electronic enforcement monitoring and automated logging and event data sharing) the safer behavior of drivers and fleet operators.
Although the evidence is not exactly pouring in, industry data is pointing to improvement and also revealing gaps – which the FMCSA seems to be trying to address with some rules modification – now that the system is moved from honeymoon to domestic reality.
The other automation trend bugging the industry is the shiny new “monorail” and saviour of public safety, otherwise known autonomous vehicles and more specifically autonomous commercial vehicles.
Harvard says: Don’t paaark the autonoumous truck in the yaaard just yet
From the Harvard Business Review comes this recent article “Automation Isn’t About to Make Truckers Obsolete” which finds that commerce and industry might just want to rethink any headlong jump into robot trucks.
Noting that “hardly a day goes by without someone suggesting that technologies like AI, machine learning, and robotics will transform the 21st century labor market,” the authors explain a prominent example of this has been the trucking industry and drivers – an occupation that spans multiple industries and moves over 70% of U.S. freight by weight — and that many speculate will see a widespread loss of jobs with the rise of self-driving technology. Harvard Business Review says some have forecast that autonomous vehicles will eliminate 2-3 million trucking jobs over the next several years.
Hey robotic dystopia, not so fast
Says the brains and data of Harvard: No future in that future. “Looking at the data, we believe that, while the risk of job loss from automation is very real, the projections that often get touted are overstated.:
In their study in the Industrial and Labor Relations Review, the authors offer three key reasons why:
- Reason #1: Truck drivers do more than drive trucks.
- Reason #2: Full automation of truck driving is far into the future.
- Reason #3: There aren’t as many truck drivers in the U.S. as people think.
Which does make perfectly good sense even if the study did come from the Ivy League. What’s interesting and is always making for a great story is the confidence tech’s true believers have in the ability of automation to eliminate the human factors and behaviors that impinge on safety.
Accenture and Stevens Institute of Technology put out a whitepaper that is so very positive autonomous and automated vehicles will actually depress commercial truck insurance rates it might astonish you.
Accenture’s paper is enlightening but as Harvard mentions full automation of trucking is a LONG way off. Heck we all thought we would be doing the Jetson’s thing right now, but that seems to still be the provenance of animated fantasy. Could it be crazy irony that safety technologies and automating regulatory compliance and now roiling the industry may actually have the effect of keeping rather than pushing drivers from their seats? It appears time will tell!